2008年10月2日 星期四

China’s cyber army

Times Online Logo 222 x 25

From
September 8, 2007

China’s cyber army is preparing to march on America, says Pentagon

American intelligence suggests China is preparing for electronic warfare

(© Corbis. All Rights Reserved)

Chinese military hackers have prepared a detailed plan to disable America’s aircraft battle carrier fleet with a devastating cyber attack, according to a Pentagon report obtained by The Times.

The blueprint for such an assault, drawn up by two hackers working for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is part of an aggressive push by Beijing to achieve “electronic dominance” over each of its global rivals by 2050, particularly the US, Britain, Russia and South Korea.

China’s ambitions extend to crippling an enemy’s financial, military and communications capabilities early in a conflict, according to military documents and generals’ speeches that are being analysed by US intelligence officials. Describing what is in effect a new arms race, a Pentagon assessment states that China’s military regards offensive computer operations as “critical to seize the initiative” in the first stage of a war.

The plan to cripple the US aircraft carrier battle groups was authored by two PLA air force officials, Sun Yiming and Yang Liping. It also emerged this week that the Chinese military hacked into the US Defence Secretary’s computer system in June; have regularly penetrated computers in at least 10 Whitehall departments, including military files, and infiltrated German government systems this year.

Cyber attacks by China have become so frequent and aggressive that President Bush, without referring directly to Beijing, said this week that “a lot of our systems are vulnerable to attack”. He indicated that he would raise the subject with Hu Jintao, the Chinese President, when they met in Sydney at the Apec summit. Mr Hu denied that China was responsible for the attack on Robert Gates, the US Defence Secretary.

Larry M. Wortzel, the author of the US Army War College report, said: “The thing that should give us pause is that in many Chinese military manuals they identify the US as the country they are most likely to go to war with. They are moving very rapidly to master this new form of warfare.” The two PLA hackers produced a “virtual guidebook for electronic warfare and jamming” after studying dozens of US and Nato manuals on military tactics, according to the document.

The Pentagon logged more than 79,000 attempted intrusions in 2005. About 1,300 were successful, including the penetration of computers linked to the Army’s 101st and 82nd Airborne Divisions and the 4th Infantry Division. In August and September of that year Chinese hackers penetrated US State Department computers in several parts of the world. Hundreds of computers had to be replaced or taken offline for months. Chinese hackers also disrupted the US Naval War College’s network in November, forcing the college to shut down its computer systems for several weeks. The Pentagon uses more than 5 million computers on 100,000 networks in 65 countries.

Jim Melnick, a recently retired Pentagon computer network analyst, told The Times that the Chinese military holds hacking competitions to identify and recruit talented members for its cyber army.

He described a competition held two years ago in Sichuan province, southwest China. The winner now uses a cyber nom de guerre, Wicked Rose. He went on to set up a hacking business that penetrated computers at a defence contractor for US aerospace. Mr Melnick said that the PLA probably outsourced its hacking efforts to such individuals. “These guys are very good,” he said. “We don’t know for sure that Wicked Rose and people like him work for the PLA. But it seems logical. And it also allows the Chinese leadership to have plausible deniability.”

In February a massive cyber attack on Estonia by Russian hackers demonstrated how potentially catastrophic a preemptive strike could be on a developed nation. Pro-Russian hackers attacked numerous sites to protest against the controversial removal in Estonia of a Russian memorial to victims of the Second World War. The attacks brought down government websites, a major bank and telephone networks.

Linton Wells, the chief computer networks official at the Pentagon, said that the Estonia attacks “may well turn out to be a watershed in terms of widespread awareness of the vulnerability of modern society”.

After the attacks, computer security experts from Nato, the EU, US and Israel arrived in the capital, Tallinn, to study its effects.

Sami Saydjari, who has been working on cyber defence systems for the Pentagon since the 1980s, told Congress in testimony on April 25 that a mass cyber attack could leave 70 per cent of the US without electrical power for six months.

He told The Times that all major nations – including China – were scrambling to defend against, and working out ways to cause, “maximum strategic damage” by taking out banking systems, power grids and communications networks. He said that there were at least a thousand attempted attacks every hour on American computers. “China is aggressive in this,” he said.

Programmed to attack

Malware: a “Trojan horse” programme, which hides a “malicious code” behind an innocent document, can collect usernames and passwords for e-mail accounts. It can download programmes and relay attacks against other computers. An infected computer can be controlled by the attacker and directed to carry out functions normally available only to the system owner.

Hacking: increasingly a method of attack used by countries determined to use electronic means to gain access to secrets. Government computers in Britain have a network intrusion detection system, which monitors traffic and alerts officials to “misuse or anomalous behaviour”.

Botnets: compromised networks that an attacker can exploit. Deliberate programming errors in software can easily pass undetected. Attackers can exploit the errors to take control of a computer. Botnets can be used for stealing information or to collect credit card numbers by “sniffing” or logging the strokes of a victim’s keyboard.

Keystroke loggers: they record the sequence of key strokes that a user types in. Logging devices can be fitted inside the computer itself.

Denial of service attacks: overloading a computer system so that it can no longer function. This is the method allegedly used by the Russians to disrupt the Estonian government computers in May.

Phishing and spoofing: designed to trick an organisation’s customers into imparting confidential information such as passwords, personal data or banking details. Those using this method impersonate a “trusted source” such as a bank or IT helpdesk to persuade the victim to hand over confidential information. (Michael Evans)

Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.

Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.

This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.

2008年7月7日 星期一

China’s People’s Liberation Army


Published on Taipei Times
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2008/07/07/2003416747

THE LIBERTYTIMES EDITORIAL: Saving Taiwan by alienating allies


Monday, Jul 07, 2008, Page 8

At a military ceremony last Monday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) stressed that his government must show Taiwan’s determination to protect itself by building up the army and preparing for war. Ma said that Taiwan must take responsibility for itself and save itself. He also said that while he hopes to establish good military relations with Taiwan’s allies, Taiwan itself holds the ultimate responsibility for building up our military. He believes that if the government can do that, the public will have faith in it and Taiwan’s allies will respect it.

Ma was convincing when he said this. However, in the month since his inauguration, his words and actions have made Taiwanese and allies alike question his intentions. A short time ago, the Defense News reported that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) had told the US about its wish to temporarily stop military sales. The aim was to ensure smooth cross-strait negotiations and the arrival of Chinese tourists on direct-charter flights.

However, the way in which the government is getting increasingly close to China has made the US worry. While US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that Washington supports the development of cross-strait relations, she also said that the relations between the US and Taiwan cannot be ignored or forgotten. Officials of the US Department of Defense have also warned that China’s People’s Liberation Army is continuing to increase its military deployment in the Taiwan Strait.

Japan has also started to worry about Ma getting closer to China while moving further away from the US and Japan. The Yomiuri Shimbun recently published an article saying that Ma is trying his hardest not to criticize China and is placing an emphasis on improving cross-strait relations above everything else. The report said that in terms of security, Ma is trying to avoid relying on the US and Japan and that he primarily views Japan as an economic partner.

When a Japanese coast guard patrol boat sank a Taiwanese fishing boat near the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands, the government stressed that the islands belonged to the “Chinese” people and even said that Taiwan would be prepared go to war with Japan over the Diaoyutai dispute if necessary. Ma did this because he no longer views Japan as an ally. In his inauguration speech, he focused on cross-strait relations and did not once mention Japan. This worried Japanese officials attending the inauguration and their concern is perfectly understandable.

These incidents show that Ma’s actions contradict his comments about making Taiwan more able to protect itself and establishing good military relations with our allies. Taiwan is in a difficult position and Beijing has still not given up the idea of taking over Taiwan. At the same time, it is within the interests of the US and Japan to see stability, peace and security in the Taiwan Strait.

As a safety mechanism, the US-Japan alliance is extremely important to Taiwan and any Taiwanese leader who puts Taiwan first would definitely give priority to Taiwan’s relations with both countries.

It is indeed a pity that the future of Taiwan’s security took a severe turn for the worse after May 20. Ma has put cross-strait relations above diplomacy and given priority to improving cross-strait ties. It turns out what he really means by improving cross-strait relations is sacrificing Taiwan’s sovereignty and agreeing with Beijing on its “one China” policy. Even if Ma says that the so-called “1992 consensus” means “one China with each side having its own interpretation,” he is still accepting the “one China” policy.

By accepting the “one China” policy and agreeing that Taiwan and China have always been parts of one China, Ma has not only shaken the position of countries that once supported Taiwan, like the US and Japan, but he also positions both of them as obstacles on his path toward eventual unification with the motherland. By seeing these former allies as obstacles, it is unavoidable that Ma will say and do things that make the US and Japan cautious. We really need to think hard about exactly what Ma means when he says “our country” and our “allies.”

In a diplomatic white paper released during the presidential campaign, Ma said he would continue to support the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan because it is an important security mechanism for East Asia. He criticized the Democratic Progressive Party for squandering the trust that once existed between Taipei and Washington.

But after a little more than a month in power, Ma has made it obvious to Japan that he is getting close to China and is moving away from the US and Japan. Remember how Ma said that he was confident he could bring “a century of prosperity and stability to Taiwan” as long as he could have eight years in power? By listening to what he has said and looking at what he has done, the prosperity and stability he was referring to must mean “eventual unification” with China.

Must the people of Taiwan quietly accept this? Must they allow Ma to use China’s massive economy as an excuse to ruin Taiwan’s future and prosperity? Ma vowed to “protect the nation” in his inauguration speech. It will be interesting indeed to see just how many people are willing to keep a president in power who has gone back on his word.

Translated by Drew Cameron
Copyright © 1999-2008 The Taipei Times. All rights reserved.