是誰在亂?

2630~阿扁的罪狀

Posted: 20 Nov 2008 01:26 AM CST


製片: sobeit

到底是誰在亂?

Posted: 19 Nov 2008 08:30 PM CST
最近出現那麼多群眾運動, 有人說經濟已經爛成這樣子, 不要再鬧了
我們倒是可以來看看, 到底是誰在鬧
現在公權力到底在誰的手裡?
現在是誰在主政?
到底誰有能力亂搞?


20080903馬英九：希望在2016年達到633目標

20070719蕭萬長下豪語 國民黨執政股市萬點起漲

20080917劉兆玄:台灣景氣第4季可望因擴大內需好轉

20080719台股跌不停 曾說兩萬點 經長：玩笑話

20081028台經長：馬上好 只是競選口號

20080623邱正雄：外資看多台股 現是中長期買點

20080905台股慘跌 財長要投資人自己負責 有人賠到自殺 李述德：個人問題

20080521馬部會拒收花 花店叫苦連天

20080601新生活運動，浪費就是「缺德族」

20080609綠卡風暴延燒 劉兆玄回應稱要有國際觀

20080606被指仍持綠卡 薛香川沒有正面回應 只強調愛台灣

20080628觀光局迎陸客 簡體官網無國旗　國號、國旗沒了！

20080618若見陳雲林 馬：就互稱先生

20080904馬：兩岸非國與國 屬特別關係

20081103總統馬英九日前指稱，兩岸關係不是以「國籍」劃分，是以「戶籍」劃分

20080603吳伯雄「感覺」對岸不可能射飛彈

20081116国民党秘书长：两情若相悦 统一又何妨？

20081012中國漁工上岸工作// 勞團轟馬 變相開放陸勞

20080531拍馬屁？拚觀光？苗縣要蓋「馬奮館」

20081106陳雲林訪台不願見中華民國國旗 抗議升級

20081106上揚員工：警察逼我們關音樂

20081112中縣府查請假 綠批白色恐怖

20080919馬英九在辛樂克颱風來襲期間，還是天天去游泳

台灣人的國仇家恨

台灣人的國仇家恨 列印
作者 台灣青年逆轉本部
2008/11/20, Thursday

Image

Image

台灣青年逆轉本部，於11/18在自由時報刊登了半版廣告馬英九，你是台灣人的國仇家恨!!

內容如下:

我們終於清楚看到，人民選出來的總統，會如此對待人民，毫不手軟的暴力對待；用司法暴力的對待；用警察暴力的對待；用媒體暴力的對待，堂而皇之地用國家之名暴力對待人民！
雲林檢調單位於十一月四日凌晨六點，未經約談調查程序，便大舉搜索雲林縣政府縣長室及縣長官邸，並立即拘提蘇治芬縣長；歷經十多小時的疲勞訊問，五日凌晨點，雲林地方法院裁示交保候傳，蘇治芬為示清白放棄交保，高舉被銬上的雙手步入警車，絕食超過200小時，直到無保釋放。
陳雲林來台期間，台灣公民體驗了「戒嚴傳統，全新感受」中國國民黨政府縱容（命令）警察在台北城公然以暴力侵害人權。在圓山飯店週邊，看人拿攝影機、相機就搶奪抬離，在國賓飯店週邊封鎖交通，看人穿具有抗議理念的恤就拉去撞牆、強行拖離；看人舉旗子（不論是國旗或雪山獅子旗）就沒收折斷！在行政院前，薛香川試圖用威權語言打發學生不成，出動警察強力架離靜坐學生；新竹科學園區上班的公民得被檢查證件、在高速公路行駛的車輛得被警察在交流道檢查後車廂！連上揚唱片放音樂，分局長李漢卿竟公然違法帶隊侵入民宅，強迫停放音樂，硬拉下鐵門，到現在態度依然囂張，高呼自己還會再做一次！
這個政府用拒馬隔開人民、用警棍痛毆人民、用司法迫害政敵、用優勢警力架走學生，讓台灣陷入更深層的對立與不信任，挑起台灣人民的恨。你可以把責任推給敵對陣營，可以把你所畏懼的政敵銬入鐵牢禁錮，可以把手無寸鐵無力反抗的
人民毆打傷害。你最好準備更多監獄，準備更多手銬，成千上萬個手銬，因為，我們已經準備好了，所有渴望自由的台灣人民都準備好了，準備抗暴，請將我們的雙手戴上手銬！請把我們押入牢籠，因為，我們已準備好，隨時用肉身迎向警棍，準備好被國家暴力的對待，因為，這個政府，現在就是如此對待人民！
你們儘管宣稱我們是暴民，儘管用藍綠切割我們，儘管用國家暴力剝奪我們的言論、集會遊行自由；儘管不顧司法程序正義，將政敵一一關入大牢，你們儘管用「挺兩天就過去了」對待廣場上的學生，儘管用華麗的言詞、無辜的表情包裝威權、邪惡的本質，我們只是再次認清你們的真面目！
不用任何政黨指揮或指導我們，我們已經清楚看見國家暴力的展現，已經親身體驗中國國民黨的戒嚴傳統，已經明確感受馬英九全面的暴政統治、司法迫害、警察暴力，人民彼此的對立，人民對統治者的恨，現在被你完全挑起！
馬英九，你是台灣人的國仇家恨!!



最後更新 ( 2008/11/20, Thursday )

關閉視窗

Ma's evil -- hate Taiwanese chen

Up Next

　

Chen, Huang questioned upon return
　

‘ABSOLUTELY ILLEGAL’: Some KMT members criticized the Special Investigations Panel for failing to pick the couple up at the airport and immediately question them
　

By Jimmy Chuang And Ko Shu-Ling
STAFF REPORTERS
Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008, Page 1
　

Former president Chen Shui-bian’s son, Chen Chih-chung, right, and daughter-in-law, Huang Jui-ching, are surrounded by reporters as they arrive at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport yesterday morning.


PHOTO: WANG MIN-WEI, TAIPEI TIMES

　

Former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) son and daughter-in-law returned from the US yesterday morning for questioning by prosecutors investigating the alleged money laundering by the former president and his wife.

Both have been named defendants in the investigation.

Chen Chih-chung (陳致中) and his wife, Huang Jui-ching (黃睿靚), who arrived in Taiwan at about 5:30am, told reporters at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport their role in the case was clear.

“We are merely figureheads,” Huang told reporters. “I signed the papers, but I had no idea what they were. I did not ask my mother-in-law. I just did what she told me.”

Huang said she did not know there was so much money in her overseas account until she read the newspapers.

The couple complained that prosecutors had named them defendants before they could talk to them.

Chen Chih-chung and Huang reported to the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office’s Special Investigation Panel office at 4pm for questioning after prosecutors, possibly in response to pressure from a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, brought forward their questioning, which had been scheduled for Friday.

The couple left the prosecutors’ office at about 6:30pm, but declined to make any comment to reporters who had gathered outside.

Prosecutor Chu Chao-liang (朱朝亮) held a brief press conference later, saying the summons had been made yesterday morning and was delivered at noon. The couple reported to the office on time. He said prosecutors had barred the couple from leaving the country should they be needed for further questioning.

Lin Che-hui, a prosecutor, said that Chen Chih-chung and Huang Jui-ching refused to sign an authorization allowing prosecutors to look into Huang’s back accounts in Switzerland.

According to Lin, Chen Chih-chung said he “had difficulty” in signing the authorization letter.

KMT legislators Chiu Yi (邱毅) and Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) had earlier expressed dissatisfaction at the Special Investigation Panel’s decision not to take the couple for questioning directly from the airport.

Lu, a member of the legislature’s Judiciary Committee, said Chen Chih-chung and his wife should be considered “culprits” in Chen Shui-bian’s alleged money-laundering activities, regardless of how much distance they tried to create between themselves and the former president.

Chiu, meanwhile, requested that the Control Yuan launch an investigation into the Special Investigation Unit’s decision not to question the couple immediately upon their arrival.

Chiu sent a letter of complaint to the Control Yuan, in which the Special Investigation Unit was accused of dereliction of duty and lack of professionalism.

Chiu said that as a result of the delay, the couple had had enough time to communicate with their family members and ensure that their versions of the story coincided.

“They were both listed as defendants and the case has drawn a lot of attention both domestically and overseas. Prosecutors should work against the clock,” Chiu said.

Chiu said prosecutors had acted unfairly by questioning Taitung County Commissioner Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞) over her alleged abuse of public funds for overseas trips immediately after her arrival in the country while failing to do so in Chen Chih-chung’s case.

Asked for comment, KMT caucus deputy secretary-general Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) said Chen Chih-chung and Huang had failed to account for the origin of the money wired by the Chen family abroad.

Chang urged the Ministry of Justice’s Investigation Bureau to intervene in the investigation.



In response to Chiu’s complaint that prosecutors did not meet the couple at the airport, Chu said doing so was unnecessary.

“If they had wanted to exchange information with other defendants about the case, they could have done so already,” Chu said.

Chu said the couple had failed to provide clear explanations as to why they possessed so much money in their accounts and admitted that they had opened accounts for former first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍).

Offering “dummy” accounts to a third party, Chu said, is illegal.

Chen Shui-bian apologized on Aug. 14 for failing to fully declare his campaign funds and for wiring a large sum overseas, while denying he had embezzled money from the government or had been involved in money laundering.

He said his wife had been in charge of the couple’s finances and that he knew nothing about the transfers. Chen’s office later said that more than US$20 million had been sent abroad.

Prosecutors have said they believe Wu used figureheads, including her husband, brother, son, daughter-in-law, daughter and son-in-law, to wire money overseas.

Soon after being named defendants in the case, Chen Chih-chung and Huang’s whereabouts became unknown.

Huang sent her mother and baby girl back to Taiwan on Aug. 17, saying this had been meant to “send a message” to Taiwanese that they would return and that it would be “strange” if they did not come home, as they were wanted by police.

Saying he would fully cooperate with the authorities, Chen Chih-chung said he and his father had little say in family finances and that he and his wife had simply done what his mother asked them. He said he and his wife knew nothing about the source of the money and maintained that his parents were innocent.

He dismissed speculation that he and his wife had applied for US green cards and that he went abroad 25 times over the past six years to take care of business, including school applications, interviews, car rental and apartment rental.

“There is no travel ban imposed on me, so why can I not travel abroad?” he asked.

Chen Chih-chung had planned to pursue a doctorate in law at the University of Virginia this fall. However, the university said that as he failed to show up for orientation, he had forfeited his place in the program.

The school said that although Chen Chih-chung had paid his tuition, he did not complete the enrollment process and as a result was not issued a student ID card.

Chen Chih-chung, however, showed his student ID to the media yesterday and expressed regret over the school’s rejection of his request to keep his application active.

While he respected the school’s decision, he said he was “shocked” and “sorry” to see the school’s change of attitude. He declined to comment on whether this may have been the result of politics, saying that it was beyond his power to speculate.

　

　

Russia moves to recognize Georgian separatist regions

AGENCIES, MOSCOW AND SOCHI, RUSSIA
Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008, Page 1
　

Russian troops partrol in Tskhinvali, South Ossetia, yesterday, as Russian lawmakers voted to recognize the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.


PHOTO: AFP

　

The Russian parliament voted overwhelmingly yesterday to recognize the independence of two breakaway Georgian regions, while Russian President Dmitry Medvedev linked the Georgia conflict to tensions over another separatist region.

The EU, which has criticized Russia’s military intervention, called a special summit on the Georgia crisis. Many European countries expressed concern at the Russian parliament vote to recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent.

With Russian troops still inside Georgia and tensions heightened by the arrival in a Georgian port of a US warship carrying aid, Russia’s two parliamentary chambers approved a resolution calling on Medvedev formally to recognize the two regions.

The Duma and Federation Council held special sessions to debate the region’s calls for recognition.

The two regions are internationally recognized as part of Georgia, where Russian troops rolled in on Aug. 8 to fight off a Georgian offensive to retake South Ossetia.

Addressing the Federation Council, South Ossetian leader Eduard Kokoity said Russia had saved his region from “genocide.”

He said there was more political and legal legitimacy to recognizing South Ossetia’s independence than there had been for Kosovo, the Serbian province that broke free with EU and US backing.

The Abkhaz separatist leader, Sergei Bagapsh, said: “Neither Abkhazia nor South Ossetia will ever again live in one state with Georgia.”

The parliament appeal was not binding and a final decision on Russian recognition rests with Medvedev.

Medvedev also warned Moldova yesterday against repeating Georgia’s mistake of trying to use force to seize back control of a breakaway region.

Russia sent peacekeepers to Moldova in the early 1990s to end a conflict between Chisinau and its breakaway Transdniestria region and is trying to mediate a deal between the two sides.

Transdniestria, one of a number of “frozen conflicts” in the territory of the former Soviet Union, mirrored the standoff in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

“After the Georgian leadership lost their marbles, as they say, all the problems got worse and a military conflict erupted,” Medvedev told Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin at his Black Sea residence in Sochi.

“This is a serious warning, a warning to all,” he said. “And I believe we should handle other existing conflicts in this context.”

Medvedev, keen to limit diplomatic damage caused by the Russian operation in Georgia, made clear Moldova had no reason to worry for now.

Also yesterday, Medvedev said he was considering a number of options in ties with NATO including halting relations with the military alliance.

“We are ready to take any decision, up to halting relations altogether,” Medvedev said in Sochi during a meeting with Russia’s envoy to NATO Dmitry Rogozin.

Moscow also signaled yesterday that it could break off some trade agreements concluded as part of negotiations to join the WTO.

“Russia intends to inform various WTO partners of its withdrawal from accords that contradict its interests,” reports quoted First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov as saying at a “presidium” of top ministers.

　

　

Ma rating plunges to 36.9 percent, DPP survey shows
　

WAITING GAME: KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao said that he believed the government’s approval rating would improve given time to carry out its policies


By Rich Chang
STAFF REPORTER
Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008, Page 3

A Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) survey conducted on the eve of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 100th day in office found that his approval rating has plummeted to 36.9 percent, with his disapproval rating standing at 57 percent.

“The poll results indicate that allegations of money-laundering against former president Chen Shiu-bian (陳水扁) did not improve Ma’s approval rating, meaning that the public considers them separate issues,” the party’s Department of Culture and Information Director Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) told a press conference yesterday.

Cheng said Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) received an approval rating of 33.2 percent and a disapproval rating of 56.5 percent in the survey.

Cheng said that Liu’s low satisfaction rating was in accordance with the Cabinet’s poor performance, particularly in the economic sphere.

The poll was conducted by the DPP last week with 1,348 valid samples, Cheng said.

A government poll released last Tuesday put the president’s approval rating for his performance over the past three months at 47 percent.

The poll, conducted by the Cabinet’s Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, found that 36.3 percent of respondents were displeased with Ma’s performance.

Liu received an approval rating of 41.9 percent and a disapproval rating of 37.9 percent for the same period in that survey.

Cheng said the results of the government’s poll were at odds with the DPP’s as well as those conducted by media groups and academic institutions.

He said the government used its survey to cover up the fact that the nation is facing serious economic problems.

While the government claimed that it was doing a better job than three months ago, the public did not agree with it, Cheng said.

When approached for comment, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) defended the government, saying that it was only focusing on laying foundations for the nation’s development.

Lai gave the administration credit for its “hard work,” adding that he believed the government’s approval rating would improve gradually if the administration were given more time to carry out policies that require long-term planning.

KMT Legislator Shyu Jong-shyoung (徐中雄) said the KMT government was forced to “clean up the mess left behind by the former DPP administration,” adding that the survey result only reflected the public’s general dissatisfaction with their living standard, not their discontent with the KMT administration’s achievements.

Shyu said it would be more reasonable to poll the public a year after the KMT administration assumed office, as it takes time for certain policies to yield results.

　

　

　

　

Struggling on in times of hardship
　

By Peng Ming-Min 彭明敏
Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008, Page 8

A friend who I have not been in touch with for more than 20 years and who has never been very interested in politics recently called me in the middle of the night to ask, “What should we do?” I have no doubt that this was the first reaction of the majority of Taiwanese — not Chinese — on hearing former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) admission of financial irregularities.

The legal implications of his actions may still be unclear, but purely from a moral perspective this came as a bolt from clear skies. This is a massive blow that is difficult to accept mentally, spiritually or emotionally and it most likely will have a huge impact on morale.

We have all fallen into an abyss of disillusion, despair, helplessness, frustration, depression and shame. While some cannot control their emotions, most people swallow their tears and ask: “What should we do?” This has reminded me of some events that I have personally experienced.

On Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese navy and air force staged a surprise attack on the US at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, destroying a great number of US vessels and causing severe damage to the US Navy.

Astonished by Japan’s raid, Americans could only ask: “What should we do?”

The following day then-US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt called the day “a date which will live in infamy” and urged the public to unite for a prolonged, toilsome war. After several years of hard-fought battles, the US finally defeated Japan.

In 1944, I was strafed by machine gun fire from US military aircraft in Nagasaki, Japan. When I regained consciousness and realized I had lost my left arm, I thought to myself: “What should I do?”

After a prolonged physical and psychological struggle, I kept going and did what I had to do.

On Aug. 15 the next year, in a store in Nagasaki, I heard the Japanese emperor speak on the radio, saying that Japan had no choice but to accept the unacceptable and surrender unconditionally.

Japan lost millions of people in that long war and the entire country was scorched by incessant Allied bombing, followed by the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Despite this, the arrogant Japanese could not imagine even in their wildest dreams that the emperor would surrender, and everybody asked: “What should we do?” before falling into an abyss of despair and helplessness.

With their “sacred” national territory occupied by the Allies, the Japanese could not but choke down the humiliation and strive on, and eventually they established a liberal democracy and a mighty economy.

In the same year, Nazi Germany collapsed and Adolf Hitler committed suicide. The entire country was bombed into ruin and trampled by the Allies. Starvation and poverty in the country forced the Germans to ask: “What should we do?” However, the unyielding Germans struggled on and finally reemerged.

Although Chen’s actions are sad and infuriating, from a historical perspective it is just an episode in Taiwan’s struggle for democracy and human rights — don’t forget how many people have lost their lives or their property, families and freedom for these ideals.

Despite its disappointment, I believe the public will learn a lesson and understand that we must never relax in our pursuit of ideals.

We need not react emotionally to the ridicule from those who do not identify with Taiwan, nor should we lash out at them, saying “you deceived the Taiwanese for half a century about being anti-communist and recovering the mainland, doing great harm both to the country and the public,” or “you killed innumerable people and took not a few hundred million, but hundreds of billions of NT dollars, so you have no right to accuse others,” or “you sold out Taiwan and its people.”

We should keep such thoughts to ourselves.

If one wants to find out if the people of a country have moral integrity or a future, one does not look to whether the national leaders are immoral or not. This happens in many countries, such as Israel, where former president Moshe Katsav was indicted for rape and sexual harassment and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is facing allegations of bribery. Rather, one should look to whether the people have the courage to accept humiliation, swallow their tears and struggle toward their ideals in times of hardship.

Peng Ming-min is a former senior presidential adviser and the chairman of the Peng Ming-min Foundation.

　

　

Wipe off that blood and stand up again
　

By Cao Changqing 曹長青
Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008, Page 8

The scandal surrounding the former first family’s remittances of huge sums of money has shocked the public, the pan-green camp in particular. Although the affair has yet to be tried in court, secretly remitting US$20 million overseas is itself a serious problem. Even former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) confessed that he did something “not permitted by law.” Undoubtedly, this is a major blow for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the pan-green camp.

The scandal has destroyed the nation’s democratic image. It has become yet another tool for China when attacking Taiwan’s democracy, as state media gloat over such misfortune, calling Taiwan-style democracy a failure and saying that the Chinese Communist Party’s one-party dictatorship is the only way to go.

This is also a major blow to the struggle of Taiwanese for the normalization of Taiwan. Ever since former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) announced there was no longer a need to work for independence in 2006, Chinese media have made Chen their principal enemy and condemned his pro-independence line. As a result, most Chinese grind their teeth in anger when talking about him. The scandal is seen as confirmation of China’s bias against Taiwanese independence.

Does this prove that the red-shirts’ anti-Chen campaign was right and the pro-Chen campaign wrong? Not necessarily. The pro-Chen campaign was launched at that time to protect two principles.

First, Taiwan’s democratic constitutional system, under which an elected president cannot be forced out by street demonstrations. When fighting dictatorial governments, street demonstrations, armed struggle and other means are justifiable, but it would be difficult to reverse the damage caused to democracy if an elected president were unseated this way.

Second, the path toward becoming a normal country, which was the goal of Chen’s government. The pan-blue camp is not only opposed to Chen but also to the normalization of Taiwan. Dancing to the pan-blue camp’s tune would be tantamount to blocking progress toward this goal.

It seems that money has a more corrupting effect in Asian democracies than in other regions. After 50 years of democracy, Japan is still haunted by money politics. Several South Korean presidents have been involved in corruption cases. Taiwan may have gone through a power transfer in 2000, but the “black gold” politics of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government has lived on. Working in such a political environment is a bit like walking into a brothel: People will laugh at you if you claim to have done nothing.

Chen’s case still has to be tried. The KMT, meanwhile, has not returned its stolen party assets. The difference between the corruption of DPP officials and that of the KMT is like that between someone guilty of sexual harassment and someone guilty of rape.

Sexual harassment is indeed a serious crime. But the problem arises when those guilty of rape go free while the one guilty of sexual harassment goes to jail. Even more preposterous is that the rapists gang up on the one guilty of the lesser crime. This is where the tragedy of Taiwan lies.

But even so, there is no need for the pan-green camp to cry in grief and blame everyone else. Chen should be responsible for his own actions.

If the pan-green camp panics and chimes in on the pan-blue attacks, it will only prove that the pan-green camp lacks resilience. A heavy blow is cause for deep reflection.

Regardless of whether one is defeated by an enemy or by one’s own making, it is the one who can wipe off the blood and stand up again who is the true hero.

Cao Changqing is a political commentator.
　

Up Next

西藏濺血﹐中共五十年不變

----- Original Message -----
From: may yang (林保華)
To: aaa zhang weiguo
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 2:48 AM
Subject: 西藏濺血﹐中共五十年不變

西藏濺血﹐中共五十年不變 林保華
今年三月十日﹐是西藏抗暴四十九周年。這天﹐一場有幾百人參加的喇
嘛和平抗議行動﹐居然會演變成為國際性的重大事件﹐其抗爭規模超過了一
九八九年三月那場為胡錦濤奠定總書記之路的流血事件﹐也是一九八九年六
四屠殺以來中國在外交上的最大失敗。
北京奧運刺激藏人抗議
明年才是西藏抗暴五十周年﹐為何會提前一年爆發大規模抗爭呢﹖除了
中共的野蠻鎮壓以外﹐就是奧運會對藏人的刺激。中共一再聲稱政治不應介
入體育﹐但是中共把奧運火把的行進路線包括香港､澳門﹐甚至還企圖染指
台灣﹐就是要顯示“主權”的政治目的﹐這點也是“司馬昭之心﹐路人皆知
”。而火把要送到西藏邊境的珠穆朗瑪峰﹐自然也是這個目的。珠穆朗瑪峰
藏語是“聖母峰”之意﹐意味著聖潔､崇高﹐現在讓那些奧運俗人大張旗鼓
進入這個聖地﹐是對藏人宗教風俗文化的嚴重褻瀆﹐因此今年三月十日西藏
喇嘛會出來抗議﹐而且在藏人聚居的各個地區產生一連串的強烈反應。
中共對待這場抗議行動的鎮壓﹐手段不但如同十九年前的鄧小平､胡錦
濤﹐也與四十九年前的毛澤東一樣﹐真是五十年不變啊。這個不變﹐就是一
樣動用槍桿子與筆桿子兩個手段。槍桿子就是無情的鎮壓﹐筆桿子就是封鎖
資訊﹐由共產黨一家編造所有情節。
根據中共喉舌的報道﹐所謂的“騷亂”是三月十四日開始。但是即使是
親北京的香港“明報”﹐在三月十一日也報道﹕“昨天（十日）是達賴喇嘛
流亡印度四十九周年紀念日，首府拉薩發生示威事件。據當地消息稱，拉薩
昨日市面氣氛緊張，傍晚六時左右，有五名僧人在八角街高呼『西藏獨立』
的口號，並打出西藏『國旗』雪山獅子旗，隨後迅速被大批公安和保安逮捕
，場面混亂。”自由亞洲電台則報導，拉薩哲蚌寺的三百多名喇嘛，十日打
算遊行到市中心抗議，但在拉薩市西邊的公路檢查哨所遭到武警攔阻，有五
十到六十名喇嘛被捕；此外，當局還在拉薩拘捕十多名在市中心大昭寺前抗
議的藏人。
三一四以前發生了甚麼﹖
西藏作家唯色在自由亞洲電台做的的節目“西藏三月十四日之前發生了
什麼？”﹐引述自己博客在十日､十一日､十二､十三日的“日誌”﹐前兩
日各有五百與六百喇嘛等和平請願﹐不但被打､被抓﹐還用催淚彈對付﹐寺
院還停止供水﹐關閉周邊飯館，使得寺院僧眾生活陷入困境。十二日兩名僧
人割腕抗議﹐有的絕食抗議﹔十三日再有幾百人和平請願﹐只是這時增加了
普通聲援的民眾﹐他們再度遭到毆打。
衝突進一步激化﹐終於發生三月十四日的大規模流血事件。毛澤東自己
說過﹐有壓迫﹐就有反抗。反抗者手無寸鐵﹐中共當局只要出動幾千武警﹐
幾個人抓一個﹐就可以“平息”﹐為何必須動用暴力的流血鎮壓﹐甚至把正
規軍的坦克､裝甲車開進拉薩城裡﹖那不是借故大開殺戒﹐殺一儆百﹐借以
震懾藏人﹖而這不就是與藏人對奧運的態度有關﹖對被激怒的手無寸鐵民眾
來說﹐他們除了拿石塊丟擲﹐或者放火泄憤外﹐還能做甚麼﹖首先開槍的無
罪﹐反抗的卻被描繪成恐怖分子﹐這是中共典型的宣傳伎倆。其實﹐中共自
己才是國家恐怖主義﹐他們對付的全是平民﹐至於民眾的反抗﹐針對的是政
府﹐當然﹐有時難免波及平民。中共開始完全不承認殺人﹐圖片在網路被公
開後﹐才被迫承認﹐但是至今殺了多少人﹐還不肯交代。至於死傷的平民﹐
則全算到藏人頭上。但是只要稍有常識的人都知道﹐到底是石塊傷人､死人
多﹐還是官方的開槍﹖
共產黨的流氓政治還有兩個手段﹕一個是“把一切功勞歸於自己﹐把一
切錯誤歸於別人”﹔一個是倒打一耙。這次自然也不例外。總理溫家寶在“
兩會”的記者會上就宣稱是達賴喇嘛蓄謀､策劃的。為了證明這一點﹐後來
官方報道﹐三月二十八日，警方根據舉報，在格爾登寺查獲一批武器彈藥，
其中包括小口徑步槍十六支、各種火藥槍十四支、子彈四九八發等等。既然
是達賴喇嘛蓄謀策劃的﹐為何這些武器沒有拿出來用而白白挨打呢﹖可見這
又是“砌生豬肉”（栽贓）的伎倆。
全球聲援藏人反抗鬥爭
中共為了樹立自己一家之言的權威地位﹐還發動網路憤青與“五毛”（
以在網絡發一則捧政府言論可得五毛獎賞而被謔稱的“網特”）痛批外國媒
體。但是根據非中國官方的資訊﹐這場流血事件中﹐被打死的藏人起碼有一
百多人﹐有些還有名有姓。而流血鎮壓事件已經遍及西藏､青海､甘肅､四
川等大西藏地區。流亡海外藏人也紛紛出來聲援自己的同胞﹐主要在流亡政
府所在地的印度與鄰近西藏尼泊爾﹐還有美國､加拿大､歐洲等西方國家民
眾的支持﹐其中尼泊爾在中國的壓力下對藏人嚴加鎮壓。在華人社會﹐已被
中共統治的香港人多數噤聲﹐怕被扣上“漢奸”､“賣國賊”的帽子﹐有的
馬屁文人還批判胡耀邦當年對少數民族的右傾政策﹐稱讚左宗棠的屠殺﹐只
有社民連到中聯辦抗議。而加拿大多倫多的親共人士也組織遊行聲援中共的
屠殺﹐但被揭發他們竟是換妻俱樂部的成員。
在台灣﹐主張台獨的謝長廷與主張統一的馬英九兩位總統參選人態度有
不同。馬英九的網站開始刊出的是新華社關於共軍沒有開槍的資訊﹐馬英九
三月十七日接受BBC訪問時還說“西藏的情況哪方要為流血負更多的責任
目前情勢尚不清楚”﹔那晚謝長廷參加西藏在台組織於自由廣場舉辦的祈福
晚會時﹐馬英九還派他的發言人蔡詩萍到現場對著媒體譴責民進黨“消費”
西藏﹔但是第二天馬英九馬上改口﹐提出比民進黨還激進的主張說﹐若他當
選中華民國總統，將不排除停止派團前往北京參加二○○八年奧運﹔國民黨
也於當晚在凱達格蘭大道舉辦祈福晚會﹐馬英九從外地趕回來出席。馬英九
當選總統後﹐再沒有對西藏事件發表意見﹐但是自由廣場的祈福晚會一直舉
辦到三月三十日才結束﹐謝長廷有再來一次﹐綠營支持者則輪流聲援﹐最後
兩天還有幾位藏人及台灣人絕食。台灣已經有些人將西藏改稱為“圖博”﹐
是Tibet的新譯﹐也就是古時的“吐蕃”也。在這些活動中﹐台灣的“圖博之
友會”發揮了很大作用。
多國領袖抵制奧運開幕式
中共的無恥及殘暴伎倆﹐震動對他們改善人權充滿希望的西方國家﹐當
然就會波及幾個月後在北京舉行的奧運會。一批運動員要求杯葛北京奧運開
幕式，兩度刷新世界紀錄的法國游泳好手柏納就做出這種表示。為此法國總
統兩次表示他也可能這樣做。其他國家中﹐德國態度最堅決﹐總理､總統､
外長都表示抵制之意﹐捷克總統､波蘭總理､愛沙尼亞總統､日本皇室､英
國皇儲都表示拒絕出席﹔美國總統布殊原先表示不會杯葛﹐但是正在遭到國
會的壓力﹐民主黨及共和黨的15名議員致函布殊，呼籲他重新考慮出席北京
奧運會的決定。
北京在壓力下假惺惺表示願意與達賴喇嘛溝通﹐但是沒有任何實際行動
。中共不但不思悔改還判處中國著名的維權人士﹐特別是關心包括藏人等弱
勢群體權利的胡佳三年半徒刑﹐進一步激怒西方世界與中國維權人士。事態
會如何發展﹐人們大可關注。
“動向”雜誌2008年4月號
__._,_.___
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
Messages | Links
****************************************************************************
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future. To publish your e-mail, simply send it to:
bay-area-taiwanese-american@yahoogroups.com
~~~~~ BOTH TAIWAN AND THE US ARE OUR LOVES ~~~~~
****************************************************************************
Yahoo! Groups
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Recent Activity

*
2
New Members

Visit Your Group
Need traffic?

Drive customers

With search ads

on Yahoo!
Yahoo! Groups

Special K Challenge
Join others who

are losing pounds.
Best of Y! Groups

Discover groups

that are the best

of their class.
.

__,_._,___

Special K Challenge
Go to Site
Search the Web