walk for Taiwan

 

We are a-bian casters3

a-bian casters

worth to know

幫阿扁念經祈福

幫阿扁念經祈福

新聞報導 - 大地之聲　海洋之聲　護台聯盟

作者 贊若

2009/05/08, Friday

關心阿扁的朋友可以聽一本228台灣神太上真經[約15分鐘] 迴向給阿扁，給他力量，也可以跟著念。感謝。 純文字版 英文版 English Version 阿扁與台灣神的生死之約

最後更新 ( 2009/05/10, Sunday )

關閉視窗

Taiwan remembers democracy pioneer

【Taipei Times】Taiwan remembers democracy pioneer 列印
新聞報導 - 自由論壇
作者 Taipei Times
2009/04/06, Monday

Taiwan remembers democracy pioneer / Taipei Times 20090405
By Loa Iok-sin and Rich Chang
STAFF REPORTERS
Sunday, Apr 05, 2009, Page 1


The Deng Nan-jung Memorial Hall yesterday marked the 20th anniversary of the death of democracy movement pioneer Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) with a renewed pledge to push for freedom and human rights.
On April 7, 1989, Deng, then editor-in-chief of Freedom Era Weekly (自由時代週刊), set himself on fire as heavily armed police attempted to break into his office following his 71 days of self-imposed isolation after he was charged with sedition for the anti-government views expressed in his magazine, which published a draft “Republic of Taiwan constitution” in 1988.

The site of that office was later named Deng Nan-jung Memorial Hall in commemoration of his bravery in calling for “100 percent freedom of expression.”

At the commemoration yesterday, cellist Ouyang Hui-ru (歐陽慧儒) played folk music and poet Lee Min-yung (李敏勇) read a poem in memory of Deng.

Kenneth Chiu (邱晃泉), chairman of the Deng Liberty Foundation, said the foundation would continue to advocate freedom, democracy and human rights with Deng’s spirit in mind, and that he hoped the memorial hall would one day be an internationally known human rights museum.

Born in Taiwan in 1947 to a Mainlander family, Deng clearly and publicly voiced his support for Taiwanese independence on numerous occasions in the 1980s — a time when such statements could bring charges of sedition.

A libertarian, Deng believed in freedom of expression and established Freedom Era Weekly in 1984 in pursuit of what he called “100 percent freedom of expression.”

Many young Internet users yesterday remembered him by changing their screen names to a well-known quote by Deng.

A number of people online appeared with screen names like “My name is Nathan, I support independence for Taiwan” or “My name is Kai, I support independence for Taiwan” on social networks such as Plurk.com, MSN Live Messenger or Gtalk in a coordinated action to memorialize Deng.

In 1987, Deng made a widely known statement when delivering a speech at a rally in Taipei: “My name is Deng Nan-jung, I support independence for Taiwan.”

The statement could have gotten him into trouble because the issue of independence was taboo under Martial Law. However, Deng insisted on openly declaring his political ideology because he believed that freedom of expression was a fundamental right for all people.

Nathan, an Internet user who initiated the action on Plurk.com on Friday, said that he was inspired to do so after watching a documentary on Deng and reading a blog entry by an Internet user last year that criticized the public for forgetting the price that Taiwan had paid for freedom of speech.

Without advertising the action through the mass media, the number of people who joined Nathan’s online memorial had passed 100 as of yesterday afternoon.

“When you know that you enjoy the freedom you have right now because someone sacrificed his life for it, you don’t have any excuse to not join in,” said Huang Man-ting (黃曼婷), a university student. “Someone may think it’s a stupid project, but at least you should learn to show your friends your political ideology and tell your friends what you believe in.”

While most people chose to join the action using only their online nicknames, Huang is one of the few people who did so with her real name on Plurk.com, MSN and Gtalk.

“The coordination is meaningless if you use your nickname. If Deng fought for 100 percent freedom of speech, we cannot discount it,” she said. “The KMT is still so arrogant because they know most Taiwanese are too afraid of getting into trouble.”

The action will continue until Tuesday, which marks the 20th anniversary of Deng’s death.



Extented Readings:
Nathan's Original Plurk
Nathan's Blog
我叫做詹子藝，我支持台灣獨立--紀念鄭南榕
04/04~07「鄭南榕殉道二十周年」追思系列活動
【影音】鄭南榕殉道二十週年追思紀錄片-焚
【影音】四月四日為鄭南榕獻上一朵玫瑰「鄭南榕殉道二十周年」宣告祭儀
228台灣神紀念碑－追思感恩鄭南榕






最後更新 ( 2009/04/06, Monday )

關閉視窗

e世代給阿扁總統的話

e世代給阿扁總統的話（新聞稿） 列印
新聞報導 - 大地之聲　海洋之聲　護台聯盟
作者 大地青年志工隊
2009/02/12, Thursday

台灣大地文教基金會青年志工隊新聞稿

自陳水扁總統受羈押以來，社會各界無不關心陳總統案件，輿論界亦或各媒體平台均以最大程度關注此案發展。台灣大地文教基金會在此段時間亦收到許多社會各界對陳總統的關心與不捨，尤其是網路上許多網友的信件投書。網路是年輕人的平台，本基金會基於２２８台灣神信仰與自由民主人權的普世價值，今日特地來到土城看守所關心陳總統近況與傳達網路上眾多年輕人對於陳總統的溫暖關心。

本基金會青年志工隊代表在進入看守所與陳總統晤談後，發表以下幾點聲明：

第一：陳總統對台灣主體價值與台灣建國路線的堅持，與本基金會所提倡的２２８信仰，為自由民主人權犧牲奉獻的精神相符。陳總統在其著作”台灣的十字架”內容中，更是提到祈求台灣神，台灣魂幫我們點亮明燈，引領我們（台灣）走一條正確的台灣獨立之路。因此陳總統是２２８精神的信仰者。本基金會青年隊基於相同信仰之故，來此傳達同修同道的關心。

第二：請媒體停止對陳總統家人的騷擾。希望台灣媒體能遵守世界人權宣言第十二條：任何人的私生活、家庭、住宅和通信不得任意干涉，他的榮譽和名譽不得加以攻擊。人人有權享受法律保護，以免受這種干涉或攻擊。停止騷擾陳總統家人，特別是陳幸妤小姐。

第三：我們期待馬英九政府能秉持世界人權宣言中第十條：人人完全平等地有權由一個獨立而無偏倚的法庭進行公正和公開的審訊，以確定他的權利和義務並判定對他提出的任何刑事指控。停止對陳水扁總統與其家人的政治迫害與司法不公。回到台灣主體意識，站在世界自由、民主、人權與法治的普世價值下，拒絕共產中國的統一併吞路線。使台灣早日成為新而獨立的台灣國，繼續為世界文明貢獻。

陳總統在罪證未足之下被如此羈押與媒體公審，讓年輕人對台灣司法感到非常地不安與憤怒。不安源於連前朝總統都可以如此隨意被羈押，一般民眾豈不是也要任司法恐怖威脅。憤怒司法服務馬政府，違法亂紀濫用國家機器整肅政敵，破壞台灣自解嚴後辛苦建立的法治精神，將使年輕人不再相信司法，台灣的民主法治將蕩然無存；這就是要我們起身反抗，用生命捍衛自己的國家。

台灣大地文教基金會
新聞聯絡人 廖建超 周淑瑜 陳孟絹 04-23723710
最後更新 ( 2009/02/12, Thursday )

關閉視窗

Human rights??

Your petition to Freedom House denouncing Taiwan clashes

Gmail hsutung yang
Your petition to Freedom House denouncing Taiwan clashes
Freedom House 2008年12月19日 上午 12:45
回覆: Freedom House
收件者: hsutung5@gmail.com

Dear Hsutung Yang,

In the recent weeks, Freedom House received thousands of letters from concerned individuals like you urging us to speak out in response to the assault of demonstrators protesting the visit of the Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin to Taiwan. We would like to thank you for expressing your concern about the government’s response to the protests. This rapid and heart-felt response to threats to Taiwan’s democracy demonstrates clearly how important you hold democratic principles and values.

In a November 20, 2008 press-release, Freedom House called for an independent investigation of the clashes between police and activists during the demonstration in Taipei. Just like you, we are worried that the historic visit of Chen Yunlin and the reaction of the Taiwanese authorities led to unnecessary limits on democratic freedoms of expression and assembly.

Freedom House has been monitoring political rights and civil liberties in Taiwan since 1972. In the 2008 edition of Freedom in the World, our standard-setting survey of freedom, the country was ranked as “Free.” I encourage you to read the most recent report on the Taiwan, available in full on our website. Make sure to come back to our website on January 12, 2009, when Freedom House will release the new country rankings based on the events of 2008.

Since 1941, Freedom House has worked to secure, protect and preserve freedom around the globe. As people in Taiwan are fighting for their rights, and for the opportunity to exercise their freedoms, it is important for Freedom House to continue its work. As citizens of a free society we have a responsibility not only to embrace our own political rights and freedoms, but also to support the extension of those rights to everyone.

You can help Freedom House continue to provide unbiased information, put pressure on policy makers and assist human rights defenders worldwide. I ask that you consider making a tax-deductible contribution to Freedom House today. You can make a secure online donation through our website, or mail a check to the attention of Development in our Washington, DC office. Make your valuable contribution now.

I am hoping to count you among sustaining supporters of Freedom House.

Warm regards,


Paula Schriefer
Director of Advocacy
Freedom House
1301 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 6
Washington, DC 20036


If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe
Freedom House
1301 Connecticut Avenue NW, 6th Floor
Washington, DC 20036
USA

Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy.
Try Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!

去台灣辦事處，倒馬吧-----in USA

hsutung yang

---

(沒有主旨)

---

Daiwan	2008年11月14日 下午 9:07
收件者: Undisclosed-Recipient
淺談百萬人島內滅中到300萬人滅中的距離.. 這幾天,上揚唱片被中國畜生多次半夜敲門,傳真,電話與信件恐號,雖已多次報案,警察局今天被質詢時卻故意表示警察局不知道此事,有誰來告訴我,在台灣的中國人不須要消滅的? 為什麼全世界有中國人的地方就是髒就是亂? 歐洲人100年前就說中國人是蟑螂,所到之處非髒即亂,妓女,毒品,販毒,黑道,偷搶騙不所不在,讓各國政府頭疼不已! 這種瘟疫與沒有人類感覺的蝗蟲,誰來告訴我台灣人不能消滅髒亂? 中國人不須要消滅? 我們舉個例, 網路上串連, 隨便都有萬餘人,這種連線台灣豈止百條,島內滅中隨便號召都上百萬,台灣人只是存在著不殺低級動物的耐性與原則,卻被中國來的這些獸人看扁了; 若300萬人同一時間被惹火,上街滅中,以每個人身後共四口人為一家計算,那就表示1200萬人贊成島內滅中,也就是必需解讀超過台灣人口數一半贊成島內滅中,適時,管你馬畜牲狗畜牲還是豬畜牲! 然而最詭異的,是數字,從100萬到300萬,在人數氣氛感染上,等於是隔壁,今天王金平已經感受到這100萬人的氣氛,才會出來說話,但姬芭瑪瑪小姐似乎想知道台灣人的底限,甚至打算用台灣軍警法檢調國安來對付台灣人,所以若要動手,我們必須先告知我們的軍警子弟,不可參予殺害台灣家人的行列,不可學軍警法檢調國安當中國人的走狗,我們必須好好教導台灣子弟,養成默契! 如此一來,100萬到300萬人口數,我估計只需4周時間. 300萬人的象徵意義是什麼? 不管是馬畜牲,狗畜牲還是豬畜牲,都將是跪在馬路上磕頭謝罪致死的畜牲罷了! 談上揚唱片事件：事關「是非」，無關「藍綠」 文：Alice 我是上揚唱片的家屬，雖然1104事件過了很多天，心情已稍平復,本想默默等事件過去，重回以往平靜的生活…….但看到電視播出李漢卿連在議會上仍大言不慚的說出悖離事實的話，還真是忍無可忍一定要聲明如下： 針對李漢卿說「因為店家覺得危險主動去關鐵門」的說詞，我所知道的是： 覺得危險急著想關鐵門的是警察!!! （套句他說的話,如果他覺得我說謊,歡迎提告!） 是他們命令門市員工去關，員工才被動去按鐵門開關，但因鐵門下方有CD架得先搬開，員工便把鐵門停下來要去搬時，警察情急又自行跑去按開關，才導致鐵門卡住降不下來、而CD架也被壓壞了！ 鐵門因為故障卡死警察也拉不下來，所以門只關了上半部，幾個警察才只好手扶著門站一排擋住門口。當時老闆在外面看人跳舞，關鐵門時她還被人擋在門外急個半死，因為鐵門、CD陳列架活生生在眼前被弄壞，也在推擠中受了些許皮肉傷。當夜修鐵門的因太晚沒來，公司門戶大開，一夜提心吊膽捱到早上，光修理鐵門費用就上萬、還不包括那個以前訂做的鐵製CD陳列架………. 我們自認倒楣花錢了事就算了，也能諒解警察壓力大一時緊張、反應過當；但接下來幾天李漢卿多次面對媒體還是態度強硬，振振有詞的說鐵門是店家主動關的、警察無須道歉、歡迎提告等等，真是令人覺得既憤怒、又難過……… 多希望他可以閉嘴啊！…… 那代表人民保母還有是非觀念與羞恥心，這樣身為受害者的我們也能原諒，會阿Q的認為沈默也代表一種道歉。可是他連在市議會被質詢還是沒說真話，還詭辯說「沒有搜索、沒有扣押」…. 這種似是而非的文字遊戲比明謊更可惡.！因為那是混淆視聽，企圖模糊是與非、真與假的界線，讓人看不清真相，暗示有錯的是店家自己！ 如果誠信是一種該被尊重的價值，.如果我們的社會還需要有公義，那真不知道誰能的忍受.： 堂堂國家公權力怎麼可以做錯事死不認錯，還不斷說謊、圓謊,還一直嗆百姓「歡迎提告」？ 這擺明是靠勢諒你商家不敢提告、欺壓百姓的霸凌行為啊！可知道看在眼睛雪亮的人民眼裡，他所投射出的是一個什麼樣的政府形象？ 上週二11月4號，上揚唱片做著它幾十年來一直在做的事：開店做生意、放音樂給顧客試聽…..沒想到晚上卻因陳雲林在國賓吃飯而蒙受無妄之災，讓公司一時成為新聞的焦點。這幾天我們感受到許多人的溫暖，卻也開始接到奇奇怪怪的恐嚇電話，令人覺得非常困擾。因為這應該是單純的是非問題，而不是藍綠的問題吧！我們能理解當下奉命行事的警察也有不得已的苦衷和壓力，但事後他們應該對執法過當做出反省而非強辯，因這無異是火上加油，也導致事情繼續激盪而無法平息。 上揚並不想從這個事件中謀利，也不希望被有心人士操作，更不願成為激進人士的箭靶。李漢卿的不實說詞會誤導滿足某些人的偏激想像，這無疑是是對上揚的二度加害；而被比喻成猶如二二八的指標事件，對我們也實在太沈重了！一個默默為台灣音樂付出努力幾十年的公司，不該也不能成為藍綠鬥爭的祭品！人民有免於恐懼的自由，媒體不應成為恐懼的幫凶，而公權力更不該是恐懼的來源！！ 再次聲明：上揚沒有主動關鐵門，也只是應顧客要求放試聽片而已；我們辛苦耕耘叫好不叫座的本土音樂已久，店中本來就有很多台灣音樂。對於有些媒體惡意影射店家煽動，甚至牽扯出親屬中有綠朝官員去刻意連結、製造某種形象來模糊警察濫權的焦點，我們要提出嚴正的抗議！！更何況家族中也有偏藍成員。諷刺的是，他還是從陳水扁、馬英九到郝龍斌的市政府顧問，也有許多的政、警界好友。即便如此，當人民基本權利被失控的公權力無情踐踏時，再好的人脈關係也沒用，因為當下損害已經造成…….. 唯一能彌補的是："Honesty is the best policy"。請高層主管機關查明真相，要求濫權的警察認錯、道歉並作出應有的懲處與反省，儘快弭平與人民情感的裂痕，促使事件平和圓滿落幕。讓我們相信：公理正義沒有顏色，台灣社會不論藍綠都問是非，這個國家還值得我們大家繼續努力！ ＊相關影片 http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=nIaGMHJAG64&feature=related http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=jFqbVi-a21s&feature=related 律師：法官一度說沒法咬上扁 更新日期:2008/11/13 04:34 蔡慧貞∕台北報導 前總統陳水扁委任律師鄭文龍昨日指出，在昨天凌晨的聲押庭中，法官一度當庭表明心證，質疑檢方聲請羈押前總統陳水扁的證據力不足，甚至明白問檢方說，「這幾個人（指陳鎮慧、林德訓、馬永成等人）的筆錄，還沒有辦法咬上陳水扁，怎麼可以說他犯罪嫌疑重大，需要羈押？」但最後卻裁定羈押，令他們相當詫異。 據了解，檢方主要以國務機要費案、龍潭購地案和力麒建設公司相關案子的偵辦內容，做為辯論和聲押陳水扁的主要依據。扁委任律師鄭文龍指出，聲押庭辯論過程中，法官當庭表明心證表示，「國務機要費性質和特別費一樣，所有首長都有，總統不可能沒有」，法官也認為，馬英九特別費案已經判決確定，「沒有必要不尊重這個判決」，因此國務機要費性質應依馬英九案見解，以大水庫、小水庫理論。 此外，鄭文龍也表示，法官在閱覽了特偵組提供有關國務機要費案、龍潭案、力麒案，包括林德訓、馬永成、陳鎮慧等相關人員筆錄時發現，檢方在偵訊扁時，雖將「扁珍混在一起」詰問，但連法官都說，「看筆錄內容也沒指涉陳水扁，還沒有辦法咬上陳水扁，怎麼可以說他犯罪嫌疑重大，需要羈押？」法官質問檢方說，「特偵組有什麼依據認定會串供？」 扁委任律師更向法官表示，九個關係人已被收押，如何可能再串供，而且檢方筆錄都做了，該搜索的也搜索了，該取得的供詞也都了，「還有什麼好串？」最後，法官更問檢方，認為未來有誰會串供？結果檢方答以，「馬永成、林德訓，吳淑珍、陳致中等」，但律師認為，吳的偵訊已做，口供已取得，「無勾串可能性」；而陳致中涉及國務機要費的繳款單部分，若依李前總統和馬英九的大水庫理論，亦不構成犯罪。 最後，檢方再提出，「在龍潭購地案中，時任行政院長的游錫?還未偵訊。」扁律師認為，這根本是檢方故意不約，留下一人，以做為收押陳水扁，避免串供的理由。實際上，游是行政院長，當時負責相關業務主管都已完成口供，為何獨不傳游？法官也當場問檢方，「為何不傳？」其時，開庭氣氛有些尷尬。 聲押庭至此，鄭文龍一度樂觀認為，扁不會被收押。但在等待地院做出最後裁示時，隨著時間不斷流逝，「等越久，心裡越毛」，才開始感到情況不妙，最後終究一如扁所預期，地院裁定收押。 問題不在暴力，在政府濫權 洪裕宏 （作者為陽明大學心智哲學所教授） 馬英九先生說，集遊法「要改成報備制沒有問題，問題不在報備，而是在暴力。」暴力怎會是問題呢？誰暴力誰就得接受法律制裁，這根本沒有爭議性。陳雲林來訪五天，馬政府武裝濫權，鎮壓人民憲法保障之集會遊行與言論自由權之後，社會擔心的是台灣民主是否告終？馬政府會不會以全面性的司法迫害及各種直接間接的方式，消滅台灣精英，或以製造恐怖氣氛，炮製馬英九熟悉的兩蔣時代的「白色恐怖」，使台灣各階層、各行業的精英心生恐懼，因而自我限縮，乖順服從馬先生強加於台灣人民的統一大業？ 馬先生到底了不了解民主？當他開口閉口遵憲行憲時，他懂不懂憲法本質上就是一部人權保障法？他知不知道主權屬於人民？他知不知道人民最大？他知不知道政府公權力的正當性來自人民的同意？他懂不懂憲法所保障的基本人權是絕對權利，只有在極特殊、有產生立即重大危害的條件下才可限縮人民基本人權？ 這些觀念是自歐洲十八世紀啟蒙運動以來，深植人心的自由觀念，也是民主社會的基本價值，不會因社會因素而被否定。然而馬英九竟然說「只要有暴力，不管什麼制度都不可以。」這跟民選的希特勒以反共為名建立獨裁德國何異？民主價值是不可放棄與折扣的基本價值。 美國政治哲學家、哈佛大學教授羅爾斯在其《正義理論》名著中所提出正義第一原則即主張基本人權與政治權利是不可以用任何藉口剝奪的最優先權利。馬英九一副軍閥模樣，教訓起人民，威脅取消人民的憲法權利，他不知道他無權作威作福，把人權當作恩賜物，你乖乖才給你糖吃。台灣選出如此「區領導人」，真是不幸！ 有些令人作嘔的國民黨籍立委呼應馬先生，說「修改集會遊行法重點在於維護社會安全與公共秩序」。馬政府上上下下都是這種心態，假借安全與秩序之名限縮憲法保障的基本人權。馬英九與他的黨真的仍然是兩蔣時代的那個威權國民黨，台灣過去二十年的民主改革對這幫人亳無影響，滿腦子依舊塞滿了威權思維。台灣民主真的已陷入危險狀況，恐怕不是「反藍色恐怖」就足以拯救台灣民主於不亡。未來幾年，如果馬先生不懸崖勒馬，台灣人民為保民主，恐怕街頭紛亂頻繁，馬先生若尚有一絲人性，請不要置台灣民主於死地！ S.F.同鄉們，讓我們週中去台灣辦事處，倒馬吧。 自從英國狗妈英九, 沐伙兒冠以來,一心想要當共產黨的龜兒子, 抓台灣人進牢房, 馬狗貪數千萬! 結果是中狗貪污, 無罪人類須坐牢, 宋狗貪污, 逍遙海外, 中國狗貪污沒有人受刑法制伏, 中國婊子李慶安是美國籍, 生孩子沒屁眼的司法不查! Hello All Taiwan is not a country, so the president voted by people just puppet leadership, no wonder every president had no much interesting to develop the homeland, but bribery or black gold, because those presidents knew Taiwanese self blurred their homeland, or did not have sense of justices to stand for the homeland, never claim the island is their country, but let other to decide the island-Taiwan is belonging to who? If citizens of Taiwan do not claim island is their country, enemy CCP takes advantages step up to claim the island belongs it, right? Abain is good example of all officials’ bribery of black gold in the past. KMT must do everyone be the same, those corruption government officials in more than half of century also must bring up to punishments and fair judgment by the laws say according. No one can escape the bribery or black gold since the past half century ago. KMT can bring many cases to the court for fair judgments, Can DPP or all variety Taiwan organizations also bring more cases to the court for fair judgment? Taiwanese should not just learn copy or echo bribery but failed obligation to bring those dirty conducts government officials to the courts. But hide them free from the punishment by the laws. Stop those Taiwanese only learn to be part of collusion but failed to point out those already involved bribery or black gold, but they are free from responsible of laws. KMT did to Abain is good example of DPP or variety political or organizations to learn and copy, which important to get rid of 3000 years of China dirty trick government official corruption. How KMT did became the world richest political party in just 40 years in Taiwan, while defeated by CCP relocation to Formosan Island in 1949? How the money did came up? Abain approached citizens of Taiwan vote civil rights of referendum to past the laws to ask KMT return the money and gold to benefit the entire people of island, but citizens of Taiwan rejected Abain approached? Taiwan needs clean and transparent governments systems by copy the US or even be better then US. Can citizens of Taiwan start watch closely each and everyone government officials or authorities and agencies that any have dishonor conduct bribery or collusion repeatedly? Learned experiences from the past for learn how take care of solve problems in the future, past is the best mirror for people develop best future, isn't true? Is anyone replying or better suggesting Louise From: mc_ch@ To: Forum@ Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:22:34 PM Subject: "消滅國民黨, 保衛台灣". Re: [Forum] Go To TECO and KMT's Office in S.F.同鄉們，讓我們週中去台灣辦事處，倒馬吧。 DPP and protesters for Taiwan should concentrate in "消滅國民黨, 保衛台灣". DPP candidates and Taiwan election did not loose to Ma, They lose the election to evil KMT empire in Taiwan, which includes its illegal party assets, its 35 province proportionate elected judges, prosecutors, its organize crime syndicates, its China centered educations and media lies. Taiwanese protest for Taiwan, have to attack this evil empire at every level, from White house to Ma, to grassroots in Taiwan. Attack every KMT affiliated organization, its members and supporters, businesses, officials. Ma can not sell out Taiwan alone, it is this evil KMT Empire, which is selling out Taiwan, destroys this empire, Ma and ROC will go with it. Masa Siraya, --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Catharina Gill <EastGate@> wrote: From: Catharina Gill <EastGate@ > Subject: [Forum] Go To TECO and KMT's Office in S.F.同鄉們，讓我們週中去台灣辦事處，倒馬吧。 To: "Bay " , sb, "fapa " <fapa>, Forum@ Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 2:30 PM This is a positive suggestion. I suggest that we need to organize a group and visit T.E.C.O. when they are there in weekdays, not on the weekend. We can send our statement to T.E.C.O and ask TECO to give it to Ma.Or, we can go to KMT's office in S. F. to protest A-Bian and other pan green Taiwanese people's human rights are been serious violated. Starting two days ago, he refuses to take any food. Hawnen Lee Taiwan Forum, Nor Cal -------- Original Message -------- 同鄉們，讓我們週中去台灣辦事處，倒馬吧。 Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:19:47 -0500 brshea I cannot send the following message through either, please help. 看了阿扁被押，我落淚了。看了蘇治芬的正氣，我落淚了。我每看每落淚，為台灣人落淚。 我們必須讓所有的美國人和全世界的人知道， 共匪馬英九，和 台灣沒人權，沒民主。 同鄉們，讓我們週中去台灣辦事處，倒馬吧。 我們可以坐BART去。 Bing The main bulk of constituents in the evil KMT Empire are "God dammed" Taiwanese. These slaves on the command of their master execute the evil acts against the real Taiwanese. The injustice today is the result of what we tolerate the Taiwanese ferocious acts in the past, current and possible in the future. Hugh Chen http://www.uscc.gov/about/commissioners/commpg.php I would suggest the Chairman Larry Wortzel of the Congressional Commission on Economic and Strategic Review of China. This is a strong starting point because Taiwan judicial interests are being undermined by strategic and economic interests from China. This is one possibility but what do Sydney Chen and others think about this? Now is not the time for meekness. It is time to assert rights of due process. Lin v. USA is doing this and is strategically important under the "territorial jurisdiction" of Johnson v. Eisentrager. We need a consensus amongst the broadest scope of Taiwanese as might be possible. TCRLO will follow up with further litigation to broaden the scope of SFPT. It is necessary to focus public interest onto the White Terror period of the KMT. 2-28 is the Alpha of ROC on Taiwan and we must also find the Omega of ROC. The beginning and the end of ROC. Washington pundits love Ma. We've need to send a clear and strong message that Ma is not their godsend. Abian may or may not be guilty of graft but he is not going to get KMT impartial due process from the ROC judiciary. Jeff Geer --- On Wed, 11/12/08, Respect (Taipei) <respect.twn@ > wrote: From: Respect (Taipei) <respect.twn@ > Subject: [Forum] Sponsor Taiwan "End of USMG?" Congressional Inquiry To: GlobalForumIntl@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 8:28 PM It seems to me that you first have to establish that Taiwan is an "overseas territory under the jurisdiction of USMG. Obviously, this is one of the key points of Dr. Roger Lin's court case, when the lawyers stress that the United States is the "principal occupying power" of Taiwan. I seem to recall that Forum also had a petition to the US Dept. of State some time ago regarding seeking a clarification of when SFPT Article 4(b) jurisdiction of USMG over Taiwan was ended...... (In other words, asking for a clarification of when the Commander in Chief announced the end of USMG TAIWAN, as he did for the Article 3 territories effective May 15, 1972.) See http://www.taiwanke y.net However, I don't believe any reply was ever received. PERHAPS WE JUST NEED A MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO WRITE TO DOS TO CLARIFY THIS ASPECT FIRST!!!! On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Jeff Geer <taiwanst@> wrote: We need to get someone in Congress (Senator or Representative) to sponsor a bill in favor of "due process" under TRA. This bill sponsor should be ultimately be someone who is on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee or House International Relations Committee. But anyone in the Taiwan Caucus would be a great start! By due process, we mean "military tribunal" or "military commission" under SFPT judicial administrative authority under Laws of War. Because the 23 million people of Taiwan cannot readily gain access to the United Nations, American due process of SFPT is necessary. Otherwise, 2-28 redress will never be achieved. TCLRO cannot engage in extensive lobbying but another organization can be created for this purpose: http://www.irs. gov/pub/irs- tege/eotopicl03. pdf

---

what's Ma and human rights

Watch 2008 First Taiwanese-Korean Human Rights Forum in How to Videos | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com